Combining Low-Level and Summary Representations of Opinions for Multi-Perspective Question Answering
نویسندگان
چکیده
While much recent progress has been made in research on fact-based question answering, our work aims to extend question-answering research in a different direction — to handle multi-perspective question-answering tasks, i.e. question-answering tasks that require an ability to find and organize opinions in text. In particular, this paper proposes an approach to multi-perspective question answering that views the task as one of opinion-oriented information extraction. We first describe an annotation scheme developed for the low-level representation of opinions, and note the results of interannotator agreement studies using the opinion-based annotation framework. Next, we propose the use of opinion-oriented “scenario templates” to act as a summary representation of the opinions expressed in a document, a set of documents, or an arbitrary text segment. Finally, we outline an approach for the automatic construction of opinion-based summary representations and describe how they might be used to support a variety of multi-perspective question answering tasks.
منابع مشابه
Low-Level Annotations and Summary Representations of Opinions for Multi-Perspective Question Answering
While much recent progress has been made in research on fact-based question answering, our work aims to extend question-answering research in a different direction ─ to handle multiperspective question-answering tasks, i.e. question-answering tasks that require an ability to find and organize opinions in text. This paper proposes an approach to multi-perspective question answering that views th...
متن کاملارایه یک پیکره پرسش و پاسخ مذهبی در زبان فارسی
Question answering system is a field in natural language processing and information retrieval noticed by researchers in these decades. Due to a growing interest in this field of research, the need to have appropriate data sources is perceived. Most researches about developing question answering corpus area have been done in English so far, but in other languages as Persian, the lack of these co...
متن کاملEvaluating an Opinion Annotation Scheme Using a New Multi-Perspective Question and Answer Corpus
In recent work, Wiebe et al. (2003; 2002) propose a semantic representation for encoding the opinions and perspectives expressed at any given point in a text. This paper evaluates the opinion annotation scheme for multi-perspective vs. factbased question answering using a new question and answer corpus.
متن کاملAnnotating Subjective Content in Meetings
This paper presents an annotation scheme for marking subjective content in meetings, specifically the opinions and sentiments that participants express as part of their discussion. The scheme adapts concepts from the Multi-perspective Question Answering (MPQA) Annotation Scheme (Wiebe et al., 2005; Wilson, 2008), an annotation scheme for marking opinions and attributions in the news. The adapta...
متن کاملTowards Answering Opinion Questions: Separating Facts from Opinions and Identifying the Polarity of Opinion Sentences
Opinion question answering is a challenging task for natural language processing. In this paper, we discuss a necessary component for an opinion question answering system: separating opinions from fact, at both the document and sentence level. We present a Bayesian classifier for discriminating between documents with a preponderance of opinions such as editorials from regular news stories, and ...
متن کامل